Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Akoya Vendor Risk Assessment — Full Report

Before you share customer data with Akoya, your compliance team needs documented proof they can be trusted. ThirdProof investigated Akoya across 27 intelligence sources — here's what we found.

Akoya is a financial data platform. Organizations integrating Akoya should conduct vendor due diligence covering security certification status, data handling practices, subprocessor relationships, and regulatory compliance relevant to their industry.

Risk Tier
Tier 3Moderate Risk
SOC 2
— Not Found
FedRAMP
— Not Authorized
Last Assessed
Mar 22, 2026

24 sources queried. 90% confidence. Every Akoya investigation produces both a risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire — no vendor follow-up required.

Get Akoya's Full Report Free →
5 free investigations|Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire|Avg. 7 minutes

Certification & Compliance Status

Need a complete vendor security questionnaire?

Run a full ThirdProof investigation to get 133 security questions auto-filled with source evidence — ready for your next audit or vendor onboarding review.

Get Akoya's Full Report Free →
27 data sources queried per assessment
Reports generated in an average of 7 minutes
SHA-256 verified for audit integrity
Deterministic risk scoring — no AI guesswork
3Tier

Moderate Risk

Akoya

Vendor Risk Assessment

Confidence Score90%

Based on data availability and source coverage

24

Sources Queried

22

Sources With Data

March 22, 2026

Last Assessed

Executive Summary

AI-generated analysis for Akoya

Akoya (akoya.com) is an Open Finance and API-connected data sharing vendor assessed at Risk Tier 3 (Moderate Risk) with a 90% confidence score. Operating in the financial data infrastructure space, Akoya presents a mixed risk profile characterized by strong foundational security controls alongside a small number of transparency and documentation gaps. Akoya demonstrates meaningful security strengths across several dimensions:

Key Findings

  • The domain carries a 27-year registration history and a 26-year archived web presence, indicating an established and stable operator.
  • Infrastructure is protected behind Cloudflare CDN with a clean threat score of 0, zero known CVEs, and no malware or phishing flags across Malware detection service and web security scanning service.
  • Domain SSL/TLS configuration employs TLS 1.3 with AES-256-GCM encryption, with no weak protocols or ciphers detected.
  • Sanctions screening across OFAC, EU, and UN watchlists returned zero matches, and no adverse media was found in current or historical searches.
  • SOC 2 compliance is claimed on the vendor's trust page (https://akoya.com/blog/soc2-and-why-it-matters), which is a positive signal for a financial data vendor;

Area Requiring Attention

however, the full Type II report has not been independently verified. Three areas require attention before onboarding can be finalized. First, 11 open ports were detected on Akoya's infrastructure — at the upper boundary of a typical Cloudflare-managed footprint — and while no CVEs are associated, the full necessity of all exposed services warrants confirmation. Second, no publicly accessible subprocessor or third-party vendor page was found, limiting supply chain visibility for a vendor handling financial data. Third, no public AI data usage policy was discovered; given the sensitivity of financial data, this creates an undocumented risk surface if AI processing is used in any form. Additionally, Akoya's HTTP security header configuration received a C+ grade (60/100) from HTTP security scanner, indicating room for improvement on the marketing site. Overall, Akoya presents as a functional financial data infrastructure vendor with solid core security hygiene and a long-established domain, but documentation gaps in subprocessor transparency and AI data handling introduce moderate compliance risk for technology buyers with SOC 2 obligations. Conditional approval is warranted pending resolution of the identified requirements.

Independence Statement

All evidence in this report was independently sourced from external public registries, DNS infrastructure, threat intelligence feeds, web archives, and sanctions databases without vendor participation or disclosure.

Investigation Findings

4 findings identified for Akoya

4 medium
medium

Recently Registered Entity

AKOYA NETIL HOUSE LIMITED was first registered in the LEI system less than 1 year ago (2025-06-19T14:57:04Z).

medium

HTTP Security Grade: C+

akoya.com received a mediocre grade (C+). Some security headers are configured but improvements are needed.

medium

No Public Subprocessor Page Found

No accessible subprocessor page was found for akoya.com. GDPR Article 28 requires data processors to maintain a list of subprocessors. Vendors with mature data governance typically publish this list.

medium

No Public AI Data Usage Policy Found

No accessible AI data usage policy was found for akoya.com. Vendors with AI features should publish transparent data handling practices for AI processing.

Security Strengths

23 positive signals verified

Clean Safe Browsing Status

Malware & Phishing Check

Clean Website Security Scan

Website Security Scan

Legal Entity Actively Registered

Business Registration

No Sanctions Matches Found

Sanctions & Watchlist Screening

No Adverse Media Signals

Adverse Media Scan (Fallback)

Firmographic Data Available

Company Intelligence

Domain Infrastructure Healthy

Domain Analysis

Valid SSL Certificate

Domain Analysis

Security Headers Present

Domain Analysis

11 Open Ports Detected

Infrastructure Exposure

Established Domain (27+ years)

Domain Registration

Threat Intelligence Partially Available

Threat Intelligence

No Hacker News Mentions

Tech Community Sentiment

Certificate Data from TLS Handshake

Certificate Transparency

Established Web Presence (26+ years)

Web Archive History

No Threat Intelligence Pulses

Threat Intelligence (OTX)

Clean IP Reputation

IP Reputation

Trust Page Found, No Certifications Detected

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Not Found as FDIC-Insured Institution

FDIC Institution Check

No SEC Enforcement Filings Found

SEC Filing Search

No Historical Adverse Media Found

Historical Media Search

HITRUST Directory Match — Manual Verification Required

Certification Registry Verification

SOC 2 Compliance Claimed on Trust Page

Certification Registry Verification

Recommended Actions

Steps to address findings for Akoya

  1. 1

    Obtain Akoya's current SOC 2 Type II report — contact their security team at security@akoya.com or check https://akoya.com/security. Ask specifically for a Type II report (covering a 12-month period) plus a bridge letter if the report period ended more than 6 months ago. This is the single highest-priority action for SOC 2 CC9.2 compliance evidence.

  2. 2

    Request Akoya's complete subprocessor list in writing before data flows are activated. Email their legal or security team and cite GDPR Article 28 or your contractual data processing addendum (DPA). Retain the response with this report as supply chain due diligence evidence.

  3. 3

    Ask Akoya's security team to clarify their AI data handling practices in writing — specifically whether financial data is used to train models and which third-party AI providers, if any, have access to customer data. Request a response within 30 days and document it in your vendor risk register.

  4. 4

    Review Akoya's HTTP security configuration gap (C+ HTTP security scanner grade, 60/100) with their engineering team. Request a remediation timeline for the 4 failing header checks. This is a lower-priority improvement item but should be tracked to closure within 90 days.

  5. 5

    Verify HITRUST certification status by searching the HITRUST Alliance directory directly at https://directory.hitrustalliance.net and asking Akoya to provide their HITRUST CSF certificate number if certified. Do not assume certification from the directory name-match alone.

  6. 6

    Confirm domain renewal intent with Akoya's account team — akoya.com expires on 2026-06-23 (approximately 92 days from the evidence capture date). While registrar lock protections are in place, document that renewal is confirmed to avoid supply chain disruption planning gaps.

Intelligence Sources Queried

24 sources in this assessment

22of 24 sources returned data
IP Reputation
AI Data Usage Policy
Threat Intelligence (OTX)
Certification Registry Verification
Domain Analysis
FDIC Institution Check
Business Registration
Historical Media Search
Tech Community Sentiment
Company Intelligence
Adverse Media Scan (Fallback)
HTTP Security Scan
Sanctions & Watchlist Screening
Malware & Phishing Check
SEC Filing Search
Infrastructure Exposure
SSL/TLS Analysis
Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery
Trust & Compliance Page Scan
Website Security Scan
Web Archive History
Domain Registration
Certificate Transparency
Threat Intelligence

Data Coverage Notes

Some data sources may have had limited availability during this assessment. This does not reflect negatively on the vendor.

  • Certificate Transparency log data (Certificate Transparency service) was unavailable during this investigation; subdomain enumeration is based on direct TLS handshake data only, which may not reflect the full certificate issuance history.
  • External cyber risk scoring was not available for this assessment; the absence of a third-party cyber score means infrastructure risk is assessed from raw infrastructure data only rather than a normalized industry benchmark score.
  • URLhaus domain reputation data could not be retrieved; clean status is inferred from Malware detection service and web security scanning service results, which returned no threats.
  • The HITRUST directory returned a possible match for 'Akoya' at 90% name-match confidence, but context was insufficient to confirm the match refers to akoya.com specifically rather than a different entity with a similar name — this certification status cannot be confirmed or denied.
  • Firmographic data (industry classification, headcount, company type) was not available from the company intelligence source, limiting organizational context for the risk assessment.
183+
Vendors assessed
98%
Average confidence
<2 min
Time to report
What a ThirdProof assessment covers

Sanctions Screening

Is Akoya on any OFAC, EU, or UN sanctions list? Are any officers or affiliates flagged?

Cyber Risk Assessment

What is Akoya's security posture? Threat intelligence scanning, known vulnerabilities, and security header analysis.

Business Registration

Is Akoya a legitimately registered business entity? Corporate status, jurisdiction, and officer verification.

Adverse Media Analysis

Has Akoya appeared in negative news coverage? Data breaches, lawsuits, regulatory actions, and complaints.

Domain & Infrastructure

Is Akoya's website secure? TLS configuration, DNS hygiene, security headers, and domain age analysis.

Company Intelligence

What are Akoya's firmographics? Employee count, industry classification, technology stack, and corporate structure.

Trust & Compliance Verification

Does Akoya claim SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST, or FedRAMP? ThirdProof scans trust pages for certification claims and cross-references the FedRAMP public registry for independent verification.

Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery

Who does Akoya depend on? ThirdProof discovers subprocessors from vendor-published pages and runs sanctions screening and safe browsing checks against each one.

Regulatory & Financial Filings

Has Akoya appeared in SEC enforcement filings? Is it associated with any FDIC bank failures? ThirdProof searches regulatory databases with entity verification to confirm attribution.

Full methodology, rule engine, and AI disclosure: /methodology

Seeing this in an audit? ThirdProof lets you investigate Akoya and every other vendor in your stack — average report time: 7 minutes. Get Akoya's Full Report Free →

Frequently asked about Akoya

Can I get an auto-filled security questionnaire for Akoya?+
Yes. Every ThirdProof investigation of Akoya produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and a 133-question security questionnaire pre-filled with evidence from 27 independent sources. The questionnaire is mapped to SIG, SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS and 9 other frameworks — answered without sending Akoya a single email or waiting for a vendor response.
Is Akoya safe to use as a vendor?+
Akoya is a financial data vendor that handles organizational data. Safety depends on their current security posture, certification status, and how they handle your specific data. ThirdProof automates this evaluation across 27 intelligence sources — sanctions databases (OFAC, EU, UN), business registration verification, adverse media scanning, and cyber risk assessment — producing a deterministic risk tier with confidence score plus an auto-filled security questionnaire. Run a free investigation to see Akoya's full risk profile.
Does Akoya have SOC 2 certification?+
No SOC 2 found. Akoya rated . See all 0 findings →
Is Akoya FedRAMP authorized?+
FedRAMP authorization is relevant for government contractors evaluating financial data platforms. Based on ThirdProof's assessment, Akoya is not currently listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace. Organizations with federal compliance requirements should verify this directly and consider alternative vendors with FedRAMP authorization where required.
Has Akoya had any data breaches?+
Data breach history is an important signal for any vendor, particularly financial data platforms like Akoya that handle organizational data. ThirdProof's adverse media analysis searches multiple news APIs and public records for data breaches, security incidents, lawsuits, regulatory enforcement actions, and financial distress signals. Each finding is linked to its original source with severity classification.
Is Akoya on any sanctions lists?+
Sanctions screening is standard due diligence for financial data vendors. ThirdProof screens Akoya against OFAC SDN, consolidated international sanctions lists, and PEP databases. The screening uses entity name verification to reduce false positives. If Akoya or any associated officers appear on a sanctions list, this triggers automatic escalation to the highest risk tier.
How do I assess Akoya for vendor risk?+
Assessing Akoya as a financial data vendor involves verifying SOC 2 Type II and applicable industry standards compliance, reviewing their subprocessor chain, and checking sanctions exposure. ThirdProof automates this across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — no questionnaires or vendor participation required. Your first 5 investigations are free.
How long does a ThirdProof assessment take?+
A ThirdProof assessment completes in an average of 7 minutes. 27 intelligence sources are queried in parallel — sanctions databases, business registries, threat intelligence feeds, certificate transparency logs, and more. The result is a deterministic risk tier with confidence score and audit-ready PDF report.
Is ThirdProof free?+
ThirdProof offers 5 free vendor assessments with no credit card required. Each assessment includes the full report — risk tier, confidence score, individual findings, executive summary, and PDF export. Paid plans start at $399/month for teams that need ongoing vendor monitoring.
Can I use a ThirdProof report as SOC 2 audit evidence?+
Yes. ThirdProof reports are designed to satisfy SOC 2 CC9.2 (vendor risk management) requirements. Each report includes SHA-256 integrity verification, methodology disclosure, source attribution for every finding, and AI content labeling. Auditors can independently verify the report's authenticity and trace each finding to its original source.
How is ThirdProof different from a security questionnaire?+
Security questionnaires require vendor participation, take weeks, and produce self-reported answers. ThirdProof queries 27 independent intelligence sources — no vendor involvement needed. Risk tiers are assigned by a deterministic rules engine (not AI opinion), and every finding links to its original source. You get an audit-ready report in an average of 7 minutes instead of waiting weeks for a questionnaire response.

Akoya is used by your team. Have you assessed their risk?

SOC 2 CC9.2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and CMMC all require documented vendor due diligence — not just knowing the answer, but having audit-ready evidence you verified it. Most compliance teams can't produce that documentation on demand.

ThirdProof investigates Akoya across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — sanctions screening, cyber posture, SOC 2 verification, FedRAMP status, and more. Every investigation produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire your prospects and auditors expect to see.

✓ 5 free investigations✓ Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire✓ No credit card required✓ Average report time: 7 minutes

Replaces $600–$900 in manual compliance consulting time per vendor assessed.