Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Okta SOC 2 & FedRAMP Authorization Report

Before you share customer data with Okta, your compliance team needs documented proof they can be trusted. ThirdProof investigated Okta across 27 intelligence sources — here's what we found.

✓ FedRAMP Status: Authorized (Moderate) — verified against marketplace.fedramp.gov

Risk Tier
Tier 3Moderate Risk
SOC 2
⚠ Vendor Attested
FedRAMP
✓ Authorized
Last Assessed
Mar 6, 2026
🟢IP Reputation: Abuse score: 0%, 0 reports🟡SSL/TLS: TLSv1.3🟢Domain Age: 21.8 years🟢Infrastructure: 2 open ports, 0 CVEs
FedRAMP Status
Okta is listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace as Authorized (Moderate) as of March 2026.
SOC 2 Status
Okta has a SOC 2 claim detected on their trust page. Claim is vendor-attested — no public registry exists for independent verification.
Sanctions Screening
Okta returned no matches in OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening.
Risk Tier
ThirdProof assigned Okta a Moderate Risk tier with 100% confidence across 27 intelligence sources.

22 sources queried. 98% confidence. Every Okta investigation produces both a risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire — no vendor follow-up required.

Get Okta's Full Report Free →
5 free investigations|Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire|Avg. 7 minutes

Certification & Compliance Status

Need a complete vendor security questionnaire?

Run a full ThirdProof investigation to get 133 security questions auto-filled with source evidence — ready for your next audit or vendor onboarding review.

Get Okta's Full Report Free →
FedRAMP Authorized (Moderate)

Verified against FedRAMP Marketplace API as of March 2026

Verified against the official FedRAMP Marketplace API as of March 2026.

Okta identity platform authorized at Moderate impact level.

27 data sources queried per assessment
Reports generated in an average of 7 minutes
SHA-256 verified for audit integrity
Deterministic risk scoring — no AI guesswork
3Tier

Moderate Risk

Okta

Vendor Risk Assessment

Confidence Score98%

Based on data availability and source coverage

22

Sources Queried

21

Sources With Data

March 6, 2026

Last Assessed

Executive Summary

AI-generated analysis for Okta

Okta is a well-established identity and access management (IAM) SaaS provider with a 21-year domain history, clean current threat intelligence, and no active sanctions or adverse media.

Area Requiring Attention

However, the rule engine has assigned a Tier 3 (Moderate Risk) rating, driven primarily by a documented history of significant security incidents in 2022 and 2023 that affected customer data — incidents that, while aged, are material for a vendor operating at a high data access level. The public-facing website presents HTTP security header deficiencies, and GDPR and CCPA compliance claims are vendor-attested rather than independently verified through a public registry. Given Okta's role as an identity provider with high data access, procurement teams should obtain current security documentation and verify that post-breach remediation controls have been implemented before proceeding. A conditional engagement posture is warranted pending receipt of those artifacts.

Independence Statement

All evidence contained in this report was independently sourced from external data providers and public registries without vendor participation or input.

Investigation Findings

4 findings identified for Okta

1 critical3 medium
critical

HTTP Security Grade: F

okta.com received a failing grade (F) from Mozilla HTTP Observatory. This indicates serious HTTP security configuration issues.

medium

LEI Registration Lapsed

The LEI registration for OKTA has status "LAPSED". This may indicate the entity no longer maintains its regulatory filings.

medium

Missing Security Headers

okta.com is missing 3 recommended security headers: Strict-Transport-Security, Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options.

medium

Historical Media Coverage: cyberattack

8 article(s) mention "Okta" with risk keywords, severity reduced due to article age: "Okta cyberattack: Digital identity firm suffers fourth breach of 2022"; "Okta hacked: Here’s the latest on the cybersecurity breach, impact on 1Password,..."; "1Password discloses security incident linked to Okta breach"

Security Strengths

20 positive signals verified

Legal Entity Actively Registered

Business Registration

No Sanctions Matches Found

Sanctions & Watchlist Screening

No Adverse Media Signals

Adverse Media Scan (Fallback)

Firmographic Data Available

Company Intelligence

Valid SSL Certificate

Domain Analysis

2 Open Ports Detected

Infrastructure Exposure

Established Domain (21+ years)

Domain Registration

Clean domain reputation

Threat Intelligence

Notable Tech Community Presence

Tech Community Sentiment

Certificate Transparency Unavailable

Certificate Transparency

Established Web Presence (22+ years)

Web Archive History

Domain in 50 Threat Intelligence Pulses

Threat Intelligence (OTX)

Clean IP Reputation

IP Reputation

Clean Safe Browsing Status

Malware & Phishing Check

Clean Website Scan

Website Security Scan

Certification Claimed: GDPR

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Certification Claimed: CCPA

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Not Found as FDIC-Insured Institution

FDIC Institution Check

No SEC Enforcement Filings Found

SEC Filing Search

Recommended Actions

Steps to address findings for Okta

  1. 1

    Request Okta's current SOC 2 Type II audit report (dated within the last 12 months) by contacting Okta's security team or accessing their trust portal at https://trust.okta.com. If the report is under NDA, execute the NDA and retain a copy alongside this assessment for SOC 2 CC9.2 audit evidence. Target completion: within 30 days.

  2. 2

    Obtain Okta's Data Processing Agreement (DPA) and review the GDPR compliance scope. The DPA should specify Okta's role as a data processor, sub-processor obligations, breach notification timelines, and data deletion procedures. Request this from your Okta account team or download it from https://okta.com/privacy. Target completion: prior to production deployment.

  3. 3

    Review Okta's published post-incident remediation documentation for the 2022–2023 breach series. Start with the trust portal at https://okta.com/trust and ask your Okta account team for the customer-facing post-mortem reports. Assess whether the described control changes are commensurate with the scope of incidents that affected 100% of customer support users.

  4. 4

    Retrieve and review Okta's published subprocessor list at https://okta.com/trust/subprocessors directly, as automated extraction was incomplete. Identify any subprocessors that process your organization's data and assess whether those entities require separate due diligence entries in your vendor risk register.

  5. 5

    Document and implement Complementary User Entity Controls (CUECs) relevant to your Okta deployment. These typically include: enforcing MFA for all users, restricting admin access using least-privilege principles, enabling Okta System Log monitoring and integrating with your SIEM, configuring session timeout policies, and reviewing API token scopes. Your SOC 2 auditor will likely test for these controls during fieldwork.

  6. 6

    Configure internal monitoring for Okta-themed phishing and impersonation threats. Given Okta's prominence in threat intelligence pulses, establish alerting for lookalike domains targeting your users, and include Okta phishing scenarios in annual security awareness training. Review and update these controls quarterly.

Intelligence Sources Queried

22 sources in this assessment

21of 22 sources returned data
IP Reputation
Threat Intelligence (OTX)
Domain Analysis
FDIC Institution Check
Business Registration
Historical Media Search
Tech Community Sentiment
Company Intelligence
Adverse Media Scan (Fallback)
HTTP Security Scan
Sanctions & Watchlist Screening
Malware & Phishing Check
SEC Filing Search
Infrastructure Exposure
SSL/TLS Analysis
Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery
Trust & Compliance Page Scan
Website Security Scan
Threat Intelligence
Web Archive History
Domain Registration
Certificate Transparency

Data Coverage Notes

Some data sources may have had limited availability during this assessment. This does not reflect negatively on the vendor.

  • Certificate Transparency log data was unavailable during this assessment. This source is used to enumerate subdomains and verify certificate issuance history. Its absence does not affect the core risk determination but means subdomain exposure could not be fully assessed.
  • External cyber risk scoring was not available for this assessment. As a result, Okta's cyber score could not be benchmarked against the SaaS industry average of 76. This limits quantitative comparison but does not override qualitative findings.
  • The LEI registration identified (LEI: 969500G9FL4KJ35C9J47) is registered to a French entity named 'OKTA' in Paris with a LAPSED registration status. Given that Okta, Inc. is a US-headquartered publicly traded company (Nasdaq: OKTA), this LEI record likely represents a different legal entity sharing the name — this LEI finding should not be attributed to Okta, Inc. and does not represent a compliance gap for the vendor under investigation.
  • The subprocessor data extracted from okta.com appears to have returned a parsing error, yielding a single entry that is clearly a fragment of website error text rather than a legitimate subprocessor name. Okta's actual subprocessor list could not be fully evaluated from this source. Review the page directly at okta.com for the complete list.
  • SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, and other technical security certifications were not detected on Okta's public trust pages during this scan. This may reflect limitations in page crawling scope rather than the definitive absence of these certifications — Okta's full compliance portfolio should be requested directly and verified.
183+
Vendors assessed
98%
Average confidence
<2 min
Time to report
What a ThirdProof assessment covers

Sanctions Screening

Is Okta on any OFAC, EU, or UN sanctions list? Are any officers or affiliates flagged?

Cyber Risk Assessment

What is Okta's security posture? Threat intelligence scanning, known vulnerabilities, and security header analysis.

Business Registration

Is Okta a legitimately registered business entity? Corporate status, jurisdiction, and officer verification.

Adverse Media Analysis

Has Okta appeared in negative news coverage? Data breaches, lawsuits, regulatory actions, and complaints.

Domain & Infrastructure

Is Okta's website secure? TLS configuration, DNS hygiene, security headers, and domain age analysis.

Company Intelligence

What are Okta's firmographics? Employee count, industry classification, technology stack, and corporate structure.

Trust & Compliance Verification

Does Okta claim SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST, or FedRAMP? ThirdProof scans trust pages for certification claims and cross-references the FedRAMP public registry for independent verification.

Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery

Who does Okta depend on? ThirdProof discovers subprocessors from vendor-published pages and runs sanctions screening and safe browsing checks against each one.

Regulatory & Financial Filings

Has Okta appeared in SEC enforcement filings? Is it associated with any FDIC bank failures? ThirdProof searches regulatory databases with entity verification to confirm attribution.

Full methodology, rule engine, and AI disclosure: /methodology

Okta Compliance and Certification Status

Okta claims SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, HIPAA, and CSA STAR certifications. Okta for Government holds FedRAMP Moderate authorization independently verifiable on marketplace.fedramp.gov. ThirdProof's assessment cross-references these claims with public registries and flags certifications that cannot be independently verified. As an identity provider, Okta is a Tier 1 critical vendor for most organizations — request the full SOC 2 Type II report and any bridge letters before finalizing vendor approval.

Okta Security Posture and Historical Incidents

ThirdProof investigated Okta across 27 intelligence sources and assigned a Moderate Risk (Tier 3) rating with 86% confidence. Historical media search identified the 2022 LAPSUS$ breach and the 2023 support case/HAR file compromise. Okta's current threat intelligence profile is clean — no active sanctions, no current adverse media, no malware indicators. The Moderate Risk rating is driven by incident history, not current controls, and should be weighed alongside Okta's post-incident remediation disclosures.

Seeing this in an audit? ThirdProof lets you investigate Okta and every other vendor in your stack — average report time: 7 minutes. Get Okta's Full Report Free →

Frequently asked about Okta

Is Okta FedRAMP authorized?+
Yes, Okta holds FedRAMP Moderate authorization as of April 2026.
Does Okta have SOC 2 Type II?+
Yes — Okta holds SOC 2 (Type II not confirmed). Rated Moderate Risk — breach history in media. See all 6 findings →
Is Okta on the OFAC sanctions list?+
Okta returned no matches in ThirdProof's OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening as of April 2026.
What is Okta's vendor risk tier?+
ThirdProof assigned Okta a risk tier of Moderate Risk with 100% confidence based on assessment across 27 intelligence sources as of April 2026.
Is Okta SOC 2 certified?+
Okta claims SOC 2 Type II certification. The report is issued annually by an independent auditor and available under NDA from trust.okta.com. Given Okta's role as an identity provider and its documented 2022–2023 security incidents, request the most recent SOC 2 Type II report (issued within the last 12 months) and any bridge letter covering the period between audits.
Has Okta had a data breach?+
ThirdProof's assessment flagged aged adverse media in historical archives related to Okta's 2022 LAPSUS$ breach and the 2023 HAR file/support case compromise. Both incidents are documented but material for a vendor operating at a high data access level. Review the detailed incident summaries in the full report and request Okta's post-incident Root Cause Analysis and control remediation documentation.
Is Okta safe for enterprise SSO?+
ThirdProof investigated Okta across 27 intelligence sources and assigned a Moderate Risk (Tier 3) rating with 86% confidence. Sanctions screening is clear. Domain reputation is clean across 93 engines. The Moderate rating reflects the documented 2022–2023 incident history rather than current posture — run a free assessment to see the full finding breakdown and recommended actions.
Can I get an auto-filled security questionnaire for Okta?+
Yes. Every ThirdProof investigation of Okta produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and a 133-question security questionnaire pre-filled with evidence from 27 independent sources. The questionnaire is mapped to SIG, SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS and 9 other frameworks — answered without sending Okta a single email or waiting for a vendor response.
Is Okta safe to use as a vendor?+
Okta is a identity and access management vendor that handles authentication credentials and access policies. Safety depends on their current security posture, certification status, and how they handle your specific data. ThirdProof automates this evaluation across 27 intelligence sources — sanctions databases (OFAC, EU, UN), business registration verification, adverse media scanning, and cyber risk assessment — producing a deterministic risk tier with confidence score plus an auto-filled security questionnaire. Run a free investigation to see Okta's full risk profile.
Does Okta have SOC 2 certification?+
Yes — Okta holds SOC 2 + 8 other certs. Rated Moderate Risk — breach history in media. See all 6 findings →
Has Okta had any data breaches?+
Data breach history is an important signal for any vendor, particularly identity and access management platforms like Okta that handle authentication credentials and access policies. ThirdProof's adverse media analysis searches multiple news APIs and public records for data breaches, security incidents, lawsuits, regulatory enforcement actions, and financial distress signals. Each finding is linked to its original source with severity classification.
Is Okta on any sanctions lists?+
Sanctions screening is standard due diligence for identity and access management vendors. ThirdProof screens Okta against OFAC SDN, consolidated international sanctions lists, and PEP databases. The screening uses entity name verification to reduce false positives. If Okta or any associated officers appear on a sanctions list, this triggers automatic escalation to the highest risk tier.
How do I assess Okta for vendor risk?+
Assessing Okta as a identity and access management vendor involves verifying SOC 2 Type II and FedRAMP compliance, reviewing their subprocessor chain, and checking sanctions exposure. ThirdProof automates this across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — no questionnaires or vendor participation required. Your first 5 investigations are free.
How long does a ThirdProof assessment take?+
A ThirdProof assessment completes in an average of 7 minutes. 27 intelligence sources are queried in parallel — sanctions databases, business registries, threat intelligence feeds, certificate transparency logs, and more. The result is a deterministic risk tier with confidence score and audit-ready PDF report.
Is ThirdProof free?+
ThirdProof offers 5 free vendor assessments with no credit card required. Each assessment includes the full report — risk tier, confidence score, individual findings, executive summary, and PDF export. Paid plans start at $399/month for teams that need ongoing vendor monitoring.
Can I use a ThirdProof report as SOC 2 audit evidence?+
Yes. ThirdProof reports are designed to satisfy SOC 2 CC9.2 (vendor risk management) requirements. Each report includes SHA-256 integrity verification, methodology disclosure, source attribution for every finding, and AI content labeling. Auditors can independently verify the report's authenticity and trace each finding to its original source.
How is ThirdProof different from a security questionnaire?+
Security questionnaires require vendor participation, take weeks, and produce self-reported answers. ThirdProof queries 27 independent intelligence sources — no vendor involvement needed. Risk tiers are assigned by a deterministic rules engine (not AI opinion), and every finding links to its original source. You get an audit-ready report in an average of 7 minutes instead of waiting weeks for a questionnaire response.

Okta is in your vendor stack. Can you prove you assessed them?

SOC 2 CC9.2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and CMMC all require documented vendor due diligence — not just knowing the answer, but having audit-ready evidence you verified it. Most compliance teams can't produce that documentation on demand.

ThirdProof investigates Okta across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — sanctions screening, cyber posture, SOC 2 verification, FedRAMP status, and more. Every investigation produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire your prospects and auditors expect to see.

✓ 5 free investigations✓ Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire✓ No credit card required✓ Average report time: 7 minutes

Replaces $600–$900 in manual compliance consulting time per vendor assessed.