Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Is Jira Secure? Atlassian Jira Risk Assessment

Before you share customer data with Jira, your compliance team needs documented proof they can be trusted. ThirdProof investigated Jira across 27 intelligence sources — here's what we found.

⚠ FedRAMP Status: Not found in the FedRAMP Marketplace. Vendors handling government data or CUI must be FedRAMP authorized.

Risk Tier
Tier 3Moderate Risk
SOC 2
⚠ Vendor Attested
FedRAMP
— Not Authorized
Last Assessed
Mar 4, 2026
🟢IP Reputation: Abuse score: 0%, 0 reports🟡SSL/TLS: TLSv1.3🟢Domain Age: 25.1 years🟢Infrastructure: 1 open port, 0 CVEs
FedRAMP Status
Jira is not listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace as of March 2026.
SOC 2 Status
Jira has a SOC 2 claim detected on their trust page. Claim is vendor-attested — no public registry exists for independent verification.
Sanctions Screening
Jira returned no matches in OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening.
Risk Tier
ThirdProof assigned Jira a Moderate Risk tier with 97% confidence across 27 intelligence sources.

22 sources queried. 80% confidence. Every Jira investigation produces both a risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire — no vendor follow-up required.

Get Jira's Full Report Free →
5 free investigations|Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire|Avg. 7 minutes

Certification & Compliance Status

Need a complete vendor security questionnaire?

Run a full ThirdProof investigation to get 133 security questions auto-filled with source evidence — ready for your next audit or vendor onboarding review.

Get Jira's Full Report Free →
Not Listed on FedRAMP Marketplace

Verified against FedRAMP Marketplace API as of March 2026

Organizations with federal compliance requirements should verify this directly at marketplace.fedramp.gov.

Jira (Atlassian) — Atlassian Government Cloud offerings have FedRAMP authorization at Moderate impact level.

27 data sources queried per assessment
Reports generated in an average of 7 minutes
SHA-256 verified for audit integrity
Deterministic risk scoring — no AI guesswork
3Tier

Moderate Risk

Confluence

Vendor Risk Assessment

Confidence Score80%

Based on data availability and source coverage

22

Sources Queried

18

Sources With Data

March 4, 2026

Last Assessed

Executive Summary

AI-generated analysis for Confluence

Confluence (atlassian.com) is a widely-adopted enterprise SaaS collaboration platform operated by Atlassian, a well-established technology company with a 24-year domain history and top-500 global web traffic rankings.

Area Requiring Attention

The platform carries a Moderate Risk (Tier 3) rating driven primarily by a historical vulnerability disclosure involving ransomware exploitation and an unverified FedRAMP certification claim. Current technical indicators are broadly positive: the domain is clean across 94 security engines, infrastructure shows no open vulnerabilities, and no active threats or malicious indicators were detected. The 50 open threat intelligence pulses referencing the domain are consistent with the profile of a high-visibility enterprise platform and appear to reflect third-party targeting activity rather than direct compromise. Retail organizations deploying Confluence should focus on confirming the FedRAMP compliance status, executing a Data Processing Agreement, and documenting shared PCI-DSS responsibilities as part of their TPSP program.

Independence Statement

All evidence in this report was independently sourced from external data providers without vendor participation, notification, or input.

Investigation Findings

3 findings identified for Confluence

3 medium
medium

Sanctions Screening Unavailable

A critical data source was unavailable during this investigation. Manual verification is recommended.

medium

Missing Security Headers

atlassian.com is missing 2 recommended security headers: Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options.

medium

Historical Media Coverage: ransomware

1 article(s) mention "Confluence" with risk keywords, severity reduced due to article age: "Hackers Exploiting Confluence Flaw to Deploy Ransomware"

Security Strengths

21 positive signals verified

Legal Entity Actively Registered

Business Registration

Firmographic Data Available

Company Intelligence

Valid SSL Certificate

Domain Analysis

2 Open Ports Detected

Infrastructure Exposure

Established Domain (24+ years)

Domain Registration

Clean Domain Reputation

Threat Intelligence

Well-Known Domain

Threat Intelligence

Notable Tech Community Presence

Tech Community Sentiment

Minimal Tech Community Discussion

Tech Community Sentiment

HTTP Security Grade: B

HTTP Security Scan

SSL/TLS Analysis Unavailable

SSL/TLS Analysis

Certificate Transparency Unavailable

Certificate Transparency

Web Archive History Unavailable

Web Archive History

Domain in 50 Threat Intelligence Pulses

Threat Intelligence (OTX)

Clean IP Reputation

IP Reputation

Clean Safe Browsing Status

Malware & Phishing Check

Clean Website Scan

Website Security Scan

Certification Claimed: FedRAMP

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Not Found as FDIC-Insured Institution

FDIC Institution Check

No SEC Enforcement Filings Found

SEC Filing Search

Recommended Actions

Steps to address findings for Confluence

  1. 1

    Confirm FedRAMP authorization scope: Search the FedRAMP Marketplace at https://marketplace.fedramp.gov for 'Atlassian' and verify whether your specific Confluence deployment type (Cloud or Data Center) is within the authorized boundary. Contact Atlassian's enterprise security team if scope is unclear. Complete within 30 days.

  2. 2

    Execute a Data Processing Agreement (DPA): Obtain and execute Atlassian's standard DPA to satisfy GDPR Article 28 and CCPA service provider requirements. Atlassian publishes its DPA at https://www.atlassian.com/legal/data-processing-addendum — download, review with legal counsel, and execute. Complete before go-live.

  3. 3

    Document PCI-DSS shared responsibility: Determine whether Confluence will be deployed in or adjacent to your cardholder data environment (CDE). If so, request Atlassian's responsibility matrix or PCI attestation and document which PCI-DSS 4.0 controls are managed by Atlassian vs. your organization, as required by PCI-DSS 12.8.5. Contact Atlassian's compliance team or review https://www.atlassian.com/trust/compliance.

  4. 4

    Conduct sanctions screening manually: Since automated sanctions screening was unavailable, manually verify Atlassian (and its parent entity Atlassian Corporation) against OFAC's SDN list at https://sanctionssearch.ofac.treas.gov and the EU consolidated sanctions list. Document results in your vendor file.

  5. 5

    Enforce MFA and SSO via Atlassian Access: Within 30 days, audit your Atlassian admin console to confirm multi-factor authentication is enforced for all user accounts. Enable SAML SSO integration with your identity provider if not already configured, and activate audit log streaming to your SIEM for ongoing monitoring.

  6. 6

    Review Atlassian's subprocessor list directly: The automated subprocessor extraction was incomplete. Visit https://atlassian.com/legal/subprocessors directly to review the full, current list of subprocessors handling your data. Assess each for geographic data transfer implications (Standard Contractual Clauses for EU data) and add to your supply chain risk register.

Intelligence Sources Queried

22 sources in this assessment

18of 22 sources returned data
IP Reputation
Threat Intelligence (OTX)
Domain Analysis
FDIC Institution Check
Business Registration
Historical Media Search
Tech Community Sentiment
Company Intelligence
Adverse Media Scan (Fallback)
HTTP Security Scan
Malware & Phishing Check
SEC Filing Search
Infrastructure Exposure
Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery
Trust & Compliance Page Scan
Website Security Scan
Threat Intelligence
Domain Registration
Certificate Transparency
Sanctions & Watchlist Screening
SSL/TLS Analysis
Web Archive History

Data Coverage Notes

Some data sources may have had limited availability during this assessment. This does not reflect negatively on the vendor.

  • Sanctions and watchlist screening data was unavailable during this investigation. Manual verification against OFAC, EU, and UN sanctions lists is recommended as a compensating control before finalizing vendor approval.
  • SSL/TLS deep configuration analysis was unavailable. The domain's SSL certificate was confirmed as valid (Amazon-issued, expiring September 2026), but detailed cipher suite and protocol configuration analysis could not be completed.
  • Certificate transparency log data was unavailable, limiting visibility into the full inventory of subdomains and certificate issuance history associated with atlassian.com.
  • Web archive history data was unavailable. Domain age was confirmed via WHOIS (registered 2001) and is not a material gap.
  • The subprocessor data extracted from Atlassian's published subprocessor page (atlassian.com) returned partial parsing results — three entries were detected but appeared to contain page navigation text rather than fully resolved subprocessor entity names. The actual subprocessor count and identities could not be fully validated from the extracted data.
183+
Vendors assessed
98%
Average confidence
<2 min
Time to report
What a ThirdProof assessment covers

Sanctions Screening

Is Jira on any OFAC, EU, or UN sanctions list? Are any officers or affiliates flagged?

Cyber Risk Assessment

What is Jira's security posture? Threat intelligence scanning, known vulnerabilities, and security header analysis.

Business Registration

Is Jira a legitimately registered business entity? Corporate status, jurisdiction, and officer verification.

Adverse Media Analysis

Has Jira appeared in negative news coverage? Data breaches, lawsuits, regulatory actions, and complaints.

Domain & Infrastructure

Is Jira's website secure? TLS configuration, DNS hygiene, security headers, and domain age analysis.

Company Intelligence

What are Jira's firmographics? Employee count, industry classification, technology stack, and corporate structure.

Trust & Compliance Verification

Does Jira claim SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST, or FedRAMP? ThirdProof scans trust pages for certification claims and cross-references the FedRAMP public registry for independent verification.

Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery

Who does Jira depend on? ThirdProof discovers subprocessors from vendor-published pages and runs sanctions screening and safe browsing checks against each one.

Regulatory & Financial Filings

Has Jira appeared in SEC enforcement filings? Is it associated with any FDIC bank failures? ThirdProof searches regulatory databases with entity verification to confirm attribution.

Full methodology, rule engine, and AI disclosure: /methodology

Atlassian Jira Risk Summary

Atlassian Jira received a Tier 4 (Low Risk) rating at 80% confidence. Clean sanctions, clean threat intelligence, strong domain history (24 years), and FedRAMP claimed. Primary diligence items: request SOC 2 Type II, verify FedRAMP scope matches your deployment, and review project visibility settings for any CUI or PHI workflows.

Seeing this in an audit? ThirdProof lets you investigate Jira and every other vendor in your stack — average report time: 7 minutes. Get Jira's Full Report Free →

Frequently asked about Jira

Is Jira FedRAMP authorized?+
Jira is not currently listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace as of April 2026.
Does Jira have SOC 2 Type II?+
Yes — Jira holds SOC 2 (Type II not confirmed). Rated Moderate Risk — 2 cert(s) unverified. See all 4 findings →
Is Jira on the OFAC sanctions list?+
Jira returned no matches in ThirdProof's OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening as of April 2026.
What is Jira's vendor risk tier?+
ThirdProof assigned Jira a risk tier of Moderate Risk with 97% confidence based on assessment across 27 intelligence sources as of April 2026.
Is Jira secure?+
ThirdProof investigated Atlassian Jira across 27 intelligence sources and assigned a Low Risk (Tier 4) rating with 80% confidence. Clean sanctions, clean domain reputation across 94 engines (24-year domain history), no adverse media, and a B HTTP security grade. Jira claims FedRAMP authorization — verify the specific Atlassian offering (Jira Cloud vs Atlassian Government Cloud) meets your authorization boundary requirements.
Is Atlassian Jira FedRAMP authorized?+
Atlassian claims FedRAMP authorization on its trust page. Verify directly on marketplace.fedramp.gov — Atlassian Government Cloud is the specific offering typically listed. The commercial Jira Cloud is not necessarily FedRAMP authorized. Organizations with federal compliance requirements or CUI must select the authorized Atlassian offering and confirm the authorization boundary covers their use case.
Can I get an auto-filled security questionnaire for Jira?+
Yes. Every ThirdProof investigation of Jira produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and a 133-question security questionnaire pre-filled with evidence from 27 independent sources. The questionnaire is mapped to SIG, SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS and 9 other frameworks — answered without sending Jira a single email or waiting for a vendor response.
Is Jira safe to use as a vendor?+
Jira is a developer tools vendor that handles source code and deployment credentials. Safety depends on their current security posture, certification status, and how they handle your specific data. ThirdProof automates this evaluation across 27 intelligence sources — sanctions databases (OFAC, EU, UN), business registration verification, adverse media scanning, and cyber risk assessment — producing a deterministic risk tier with confidence score plus an auto-filled security questionnaire. Run a free investigation to see Jira's full risk profile.
Does Jira have SOC 2 certification?+
Yes — Jira holds SOC 2 + 1 other cert. Rated Moderate Risk — 2 cert(s) unverified. See all 4 findings →
Has Jira had any data breaches?+
Data breach history is an important signal for any vendor, particularly developer tools platforms like Jira that handle source code and deployment credentials. ThirdProof's adverse media analysis searches multiple news APIs and public records for data breaches, security incidents, lawsuits, regulatory enforcement actions, and financial distress signals. Each finding is linked to its original source with severity classification.
Is Jira on any sanctions lists?+
Sanctions screening is standard due diligence for developer tools vendors. ThirdProof screens Jira against OFAC SDN, consolidated international sanctions lists, and PEP databases. The screening uses entity name verification to reduce false positives. If Jira or any associated officers appear on a sanctions list, this triggers automatic escalation to the highest risk tier.
How do I assess Jira for vendor risk?+
Assessing Jira as a developer tools vendor involves verifying SOC 2 and code security practices compliance, reviewing their subprocessor chain, and checking sanctions exposure. ThirdProof automates this across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — no questionnaires or vendor participation required. Your first 5 investigations are free.
How long does a ThirdProof assessment take?+
A ThirdProof assessment completes in an average of 7 minutes. 27 intelligence sources are queried in parallel — sanctions databases, business registries, threat intelligence feeds, certificate transparency logs, and more. The result is a deterministic risk tier with confidence score and audit-ready PDF report.
Is ThirdProof free?+
ThirdProof offers 5 free vendor assessments with no credit card required. Each assessment includes the full report — risk tier, confidence score, individual findings, executive summary, and PDF export. Paid plans start at $399/month for teams that need ongoing vendor monitoring.
Can I use a ThirdProof report as SOC 2 audit evidence?+
Yes. ThirdProof reports are designed to satisfy SOC 2 CC9.2 (vendor risk management) requirements. Each report includes SHA-256 integrity verification, methodology disclosure, source attribution for every finding, and AI content labeling. Auditors can independently verify the report's authenticity and trace each finding to its original source.
How is ThirdProof different from a security questionnaire?+
Security questionnaires require vendor participation, take weeks, and produce self-reported answers. ThirdProof queries 27 independent intelligence sources — no vendor involvement needed. Risk tiers are assigned by a deterministic rules engine (not AI opinion), and every finding links to its original source. You get an audit-ready report in an average of 7 minutes instead of waiting weeks for a questionnaire response.

Jira is in your vendor stack. Can you prove you assessed them?

SOC 2 CC9.2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and CMMC all require documented vendor due diligence — not just knowing the answer, but having audit-ready evidence you verified it. Most compliance teams can't produce that documentation on demand.

ThirdProof investigates Jira across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — sanctions screening, cyber posture, SOC 2 verification, FedRAMP status, and more. Every investigation produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire your prospects and auditors expect to see.

✓ 5 free investigations✓ Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire✓ No credit card required✓ Average report time: 7 minutes

Replaces $600–$900 in manual compliance consulting time per vendor assessed.