Cursor Security & Compliance Status
Before you share customer data with Cursor, your compliance team needs documented proof they can be trusted. ThirdProof investigated Cursor across 27 intelligence sources — here's what we found.
- SOC 2 Status
- Cursor has not had a SOC 2 claim detected on their trust page.
- Sanctions Screening
- Cursor returned no matches in OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening.
- Risk Tier
- ThirdProof assigned Cursor a Low Risk tier with 95% confidence across 27 intelligence sources.
27 sources checked. Every investigation delivers two audit-ready artifacts: a risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire — built from independent evidence, not vendor self-attestation.
Get Cursor's Full Report Free →Certification & Compliance Status
Need a complete vendor security questionnaire?
Run a full ThirdProof investigation to get 133 security questions auto-filled with source evidence — ready for your next audit or vendor onboarding review.
Get Cursor's Full Report Free →Assessment Preview — 23 Sources Queried
Run your own investigation to see the full evidence chain, compliance assessment, and recommended actions.
Get Cursor's Full Report Free →Executive Summary Preview
Cursor (cursor.com) is an AI-powered code editor and developer productivity platform assessed at Risk Tier 4 (Low Risk) with a 95% confidence score, reflecting a predominantly strong security posture with a small number of issues warranting attention. Cursor demonstrates several meaningful security strengths. The domain has a clean threat reputation across all blacklists and malware detection systems, with zero threat intelligence pulses and a whitelisted IP (served via Vercel CDN).
This is an excerpt. Run your own investigation to see the full assessment. Get Cursor's Full Report Free →
Key Findings for Cursor
| Severity | Finding | Source |
|---|---|---|
| info | TLS certificate renewal approaching | Domain Analysis |
| info | Clean domain reputation | Threat Intelligence |
| low | Subprocessor page contains placeholder content | Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery |
3 total findings. Get Cursor's Full Report Free →
Recommended Actions
- Confirm remediation status of the April 2026 prompt injection/sandbox bypass vulnerability reported by [SecurityWeek](https://www.securityweek.com/cursor-ai-vulnerability-exposed-developer-devices/): contact Cursor's security team directly, ask for a CVE reference or patch note, and verify the remote tunnel feature is either patched or disabled in your deployment configuration. This should be completed before production rollout in sensitive environments.
- Request a populated subprocessor list from Cursor's privacy team (privacy@cursor.com or through their enterprise contact). Specifically ask which AI model providers (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) receive customer code or prompt data, and under what data processing terms. Review the [DPA](https://cursor.com/terms/dpa) for subprocessor objection rights.
- Verify that the TLS certificate on cursor.com has been successfully renewed before May 20, 2026. You can check current certificate status at any time via the [SSL Labs report](https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=cursor.com). If your organization uses Cursor's API, also verify TLS health on any API endpoint subdomains.
Intelligence Sources Queried for Cursor
ThirdProof uses a deterministic rules engine to assign risk tiers. AI writes the narrative — rules drive the decision.
What a ThirdProof assessment covers↓
Sanctions Screening
Is Cursor on any OFAC, EU, or UN sanctions list? Are any officers or affiliates flagged?
Cyber Risk Assessment
What is Cursor's security posture? Threat intelligence scanning, known vulnerabilities, and security header analysis.
Business Registration
Is Cursor a legitimately registered business entity? Corporate status, jurisdiction, and officer verification.
Adverse Media Analysis
Has Cursor appeared in negative news coverage? Data breaches, lawsuits, regulatory actions, and complaints.
Domain & Infrastructure
Is Cursor's website secure? TLS configuration, DNS hygiene, security headers, and domain age analysis.
Company Intelligence
What are Cursor's firmographics? Employee count, industry classification, technology stack, and corporate structure.
Trust & Compliance Verification
Does Cursor claim SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST, or FedRAMP? ThirdProof scans trust pages for certification claims and cross-references the FedRAMP public registry for independent verification.
Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery
Who does Cursor depend on? ThirdProof discovers subprocessors from vendor-published pages and runs sanctions screening and safe browsing checks against each one.
Regulatory & Financial Filings
Has Cursor appeared in SEC enforcement filings? Is it associated with any FDIC bank failures? ThirdProof searches regulatory databases with entity verification to confirm attribution.
Full methodology, rule engine, and AI disclosure: /methodology
Seeing this in an audit? ThirdProof lets you investigate Cursor and every other vendor in your stack — average report time: 7 minutes. Get Cursor's Full Report Free →
Frequently asked about Cursor
Does Cursor have SOC 2 Type II?+
Is Cursor on the OFAC sanctions list?+
What is Cursor's vendor risk tier?+
Can I get an auto-filled security questionnaire for Cursor?+
Is Cursor safe to use as a vendor?+
Does Cursor have SOC 2 certification?+
Is Cursor FedRAMP authorized?+
Has Cursor had any data breaches?+
Is Cursor on any sanctions lists?+
How do I assess Cursor for vendor risk?+
How long does a ThirdProof assessment take?+
Is ThirdProof free?+
Can I use a ThirdProof report as SOC 2 audit evidence?+
How is ThirdProof different from a security questionnaire?+
Also investigate these vendors
Cursor is in your vendor stack. Can you prove you assessed them?
SOC 2 CC9.2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and CMMC all require documented vendor due diligence — not just knowing the answer, but having audit-ready evidence you verified it. Most compliance teams can't produce that documentation on demand.
ThirdProof investigates Cursor across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — sanctions screening, cyber posture, SOC 2 verification, FedRAMP status, and more. Every investigation produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire your prospects and auditors expect to see.
Replaces $600–$900 in manual compliance consulting time per vendor assessed.